“Nothing to share”: South Korean firm turns down Ukrainian request for satellite imagery

by and
Singapore’s Marina Bay Sands hotel is seen in this optical satellite image captured by South Korea’s SI Imaging Services (SIIS). Ukraine vice prime minister recently asked SIIS and seven other remote sensing companies to provide synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery of Ukraine and neighboring countries to assist Ukrainian military fighting against Russian forces. SIIS president turned down the request, saying it has “nothing to share.” Credit: SI Imaging Services

This story was updated at 9:40 p.m. EST.

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea’s Earth observation company SI Imaging Services (SIIS) turned down a request from Ukraine’s minister of digital transformation to share satellite imagery of Ukraine and neighboring countries to assist Ukrainian efforts to repel Russia’s invasion. 

Daejeon-based SIIS was named along with seven other remote sensing companies in digital transformation minister Mykhailo Fedorov’s public letter, which he posted March 1 on Twitter. The other companies named are Planet Labs, Maxar Technologies, Airbus SAS, BlackSky Global, Iceye, SpaceView and Capella Space. 

“We have nothing to share with Ukraine, at least for now,” SIIS President and CEO Kim Moon-gyu told SpaceNews on March 3. “We capture images using four [South Korean] government-owned remote sensing satellites. Therefore, the government always stands first in line to use them, and our turn comes when the government’s work is over. Since the conflict broke out, the government has substantially increased the time it uses the satellites, particularly when they fly above Ukraine, to see what’s happening down there. This has left us practically unable to capture images of Ukraine.” 

SI Imaging Services’ denial marked another setback for an effort initiated and promoted by Ukrainian-born entrepreneur Max Polyakov to rally the commercial imagery industry on Ukraine’s behalf. Federov’s public letter, issued after Polyakov announced an “urgent plea” for optical and SAR imagery of the region, reiterated the need for imagery support and said that Polyakov was acting on the Ministry of Digital Transformation’s behalf.

“We badly need the opportunity to watch the movement of Russian troops, especially at night when our technologies are blind in fact! SAR data is important to understanding Russian troop and vehicle movements at night considering that clouds cover about 80 percent of Ukraine during the day,” Federov wrote. “Please treat Max Polyakov and EOS Data Analytics as our representatives for this cooperation.”

Polyakov’s Silicon Valley-based investment vehicle Noosphere Venture Partners owns EOS Data Analytics, a Menlo Park, California, company that Polyakov told reporters is standing by to help process raw imagery to support Ukraine’s defense and humanitarian relief efforts. Both Polyakov and Fedorov have stressed the urgent need for SAR imagery, which can peer through the cloud cover that has hampered optical imagery collection in recent days. 

Federov is also Ukraine’s minister of digital transformation. In the week since Russia invaded Ukraine, the 31-year-old Fedorov has been making frequent use of Twitter to enlist the tech industry’s support for his embattled nation. On Feb. 26, he publicly called SpaceX CEO Elon Musk to rush Starlink satellite broadband internet terminals to Ukraine. On Feb. 28, Federov reported that a first shipment had arrived. 

Polyakov’s involvement in the call for imagery donations was cited in at least one company’s rejection of the request. 

Earlier this week, San Franciso-based SAR satellite operator Capella Space turned down the Polyakov-initiated request, saying, “We do not work with individuals or entities restricted or sanctioned under United States government export laws and regulations.”

Polyakov’s Noosphere Venture Partners was added to the U.S. government’s Excluded Parties List System Dec. 22, around the same time the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) asked Noosphere to divest its stake in Firefly Aerospace. The Excluded Parties notice published on the SAM.gov website cited the U.S. Department of the Air Force as the “excluding agency” but does not explain why Noosphere is on the list. The Department of the Air Force encompasses the Air Force and the Space Force.

Although Capella is a private company, it does business with the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. 

“Capella Space is working directly with the US and Ukrainian governments as well as other commercial entities to provide timely data and assistance around the ongoing conflict,” Capella CEO Payam Banazadeh wrote in a March 2 statement.

Polyakov did not responded to a SpaceNews request for comment before this story was published. However, Noosphere told journalist Tim Fernholz on March that it resolved its CFIUS issues on Feb. 28 and was “working to have itself and related entities cleared from the Excluded Parties List System,” according to a March 1 tweet.

 Noosphere’s “indefinite” exclusion was still listed as active as of March 3, making the company ineligible for federal contracts or assistance.

“We understand that Max’s plea has caused confusion among some imaging providers because the U.S. government recently required Polyakov to divest his shares in a U.S. rocketry company for national-security reasons, including U.S. concerns that Russia might be able to attain rocketry intellectual property when it invaded Ukraine,” Noosphere Venture Partners President Anisimov Artiom told SpaceNews via email after this story was first published.

Artiom did not directly address a question from SpaceNews about whether EOSDA has received any imagery in response to Polyakov’s plea.

“Today, Polyakov reiterated his plea for companies to assist Ukraine directly or through EOSDA, noting that the U.S. government does not control EOS’ relationship with the Ukraine government,” Artiom wrote. “He also reiterated that, while Noosphere is working with the U.S. government to be removed from the Excluded Parties list, the listing only affects work performed for the U.S. government. It does not affect commercial, business-to-business transactions that are unrelated to U.S. government work, and it does not affect work performed for non-U.S. governments.  So companies are free to work with EOSDA and Noosphere in the way described in Max’s plea.”

 

SpaceNews staff writer Brian Berger contributed to this article from Washington.