WASHINGTON —  The House Armed Services Committee voted 57-2 to pass its version of the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in the overnight hours Sept. 2 after a 16-hour markup session.  The bill has several provisions on national security space policy and DoD procurement of space technologies.

The committee approved a proposal by Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) to add $23.9 billion to the Pentagon’s $715 billion budget request for fiscal year 2022. HASC Chairman Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) opposed the increase but Rogers’ amendment was supported by a large number of Democrats and passed 42-17.

The NDAA now heads to the House floor. The Senate Armed Services Committee in July advanced its version of the NDAA and it has yet to reach the Senate floor for consideration.

National security space provisions in the bill:

Procurement of commercial space technology — The bill includes legislation proposed by Rogers that prohibits the Space Force from starting a new procurement in-house until the services determines that there is no commercial alternative that can be procurement from the open market. 

According to the language, the “service acquisition executive for space systems and programs may not establish a program of record for the Space Force unless the service acquisition executive first determines that there is no commercially available capability that would meet the threshold objectives for that proposed program; and submits to the congressional defense committees such determination.’’

Space National Guard — The bill approves the establishment of a Space National Guard as a reserve component of the U.S. Space Force.

The proposal from Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) passed as part of a bloc of amendments on military personnel.

This provision sets up a fight with the Senate. The Senate Armed Services Committee did not have language in its version of the NDAA on a Space National Guard.

Space Force capabilities to combat threats — The U.S. Space Force has to provide a report to defense committees on the most likely and most dangerous threats to U.S. space dominance in the short and long term, a plan to mitigate them, and the capabilities needed to implement that plan. “The committee notes with increasing alarm the rate at which our near-peer rivals are rapidly enhancing their own space capabilities with a view to challenging American space dominance and nullifying the capabilities and services of our space assets,” says the amendment introduced by Lamborn.

The HASC is interested in “the pace at which new capabilities and technologies which will solidify American space dominance are developed and procured. There is also significant interest in ensuring the U.S. maintain freedom of movement and action on the moon and in lunar and cislunar space. 

The committee also asks the Defense Intelligence Agency for an update to its 2019 report on space and counterspace programs that could challenge U.S. or partner interests in the space domain.

Next-generation satellite communications — The Space Force has to provide a report on how it will transition to the next generation satellites that will replace the Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) for classified communications.

The amendment from Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Fla.) questions Space Force plans to transition from AEHF to a more advanced Evolved Strategic SATCOM (ESS) system by 2032. 

“This Committee is concerned that the nation’s strategic SATCOM capability will have growing vulnerabilities during the transition period as currently planned, and wants to ensure that this critical capability is sustained and evolved as responsively as possible to the rapidly emerging and evolving threat environment,” says the bill. 

Impact of space debris — The HASC says it is concerned about the impact of space debris on the Space Development Agency’s satellites in low Earth orbit.

The amendment from Scott Franklin (R-Fla.) says the committee supports the SDA’s constellation in LEO but “also recognizes that the proliferation of larger constellations of smaller satellites in low Earth orbit is increasing the need for better space surveillance technology and investment in technologies that reduce future space debris.”

The committee is interested in “better understanding defense investments in technologies that may reduce future space debris, including non- toxic or non-reactive alternatives to Hall thrusters.”

HASC wants a report on DoD efforts to reduce future space debris, the degree to which DoD has assessed the impact of space debris on the national defense space architecture, an assessment of the risk posed by the proliferation of commercial or military satellites in low Earth orbit, and how DoD is engaging allies and partners on efforts to develop technologies that reduce space debris;

Resilient positioning, navigation and timing — The committee wants to hear from DoD on its plan to increase the resilience of space systems that provide positioning, navigation and timing (PNT). 

The amendment from Don Bacon (R-Neb.) says the committee is “aware of significant vulnerabilities to the Global Positioning System (GPS) enterprise its associated PNT infrastructure.”

The committee “urges the Department of Defense to fully leverage technologies to harden and reinforce PNT infrastructure” and directs doD to submit a strategy to address current and projected vulnerabilities in GPS infrastructure and its plan to increase resilience. 

U.S. Space Command headquarters — An amendment introduced by Lamborn says “no funds authorized to be appropriated by this bill may be used for a new U.S. Space Command headquarters building until the Government Accountability Office and DoD inspector general reviews are completed.” These two agencies are reviewing the Air Force’s decision to recommend that U.S. Space Command be relocated from Colorado Springs to Huntsville, Alabama.

Other space-related provisions were added by Smith in his chairman’s mark:

  • Requires the National Space Council to consolidate inter-agency priorities to further promote verifiable international rules-based order in space.
  • Allows for the secretary of the Air Force to establish a service acquisition executive for Space as soon as possible, but no later than October 1, 2022.
  • Directs the chief of space operations of the U.S. Space Force and the assistant secretary of defense for space policy to conduct a classification review of all Space Force programs to determine if any programs should be less classified or declassified.
  • Supports Phase 2 of the National Security Space Launch program, and requires DoD to provide a report on efforts to continue innovation and competition in launch, with particular focus on requirements for space access, mobility and logistics.
  • Highlights the need for tactically responsive space launch and requires the secretary of defense to provide a plan, including funding, on how this program will be executed in future years defense programs.
  • Requires briefings on the Space Force’s proposed Space Warfare Analysis Center and requirements for experimental space launch activities.

Sandra Erwin writes about military space programs, policy, technology and the industry that supports this sector. She has covered the military, the Pentagon, Congress and the defense industry for nearly two decades as editor of NDIA’s National Defense...