One of the planet-hunting Kepler space telescope’s reaction wheels — devices that maintain the observatory’s position in space — remains balky despite mitigation attempts, NASA said April 29. The mission team now regards the problem as unsolvable and is considering what the telescope can do after the wheel fails. 

“While the wheel may still continue to operate for some time yet, the engineering team has now turned its attention to the development of contingency actions should the wheel fail sooner, rather than later,” Kepler mission manager Roger Hunter of NASA’s Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., wrote in an April 29 update. 

The $600 million Kepler observatory detects exoplanets by flagging the tiny brightness dips caused when they pass in front of their host stars from the instrument’s perspective. Kepler’s main goal is to determine how common Earth-like alien planets are throughout the Milky Way galaxy.

The Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.-built spacecraft needs three functioning reaction wheels to stay locked onto its target stars. Kepler had four wheels when it launched in March 2009 — three for immediate use, and one spare. But one wheel, known as No. 2, failed in July 2012, giving Kepler no margin for error.

The currently glitchy wheel, known as No. 4, has acted up before, but its problems now seem more serious, mission officials said. “The part that worries us is that the elevated friction that we’re seeing in wheel No. 4 now is very reminiscent of what we saw a year ago in wheel No. 2, which eventually failed,” said Kepler deputy project manager Charlie Sobeck, also of NASA Ames.

“Wheel 2 had elevated friction for about six months, a little bit more than that, before it finally failed,” Sobeck said. “Now we’re going on four months of elevated friction here on wheel No. 4. So we’re certainly concerned that we may be on the same kind of path here.”

Engineers gave the wheel a 10-day rest in January, hoping the break would redistribute lubricant and bring friction back down to normal levels. But the fix appears not to have worked. “Kepler’s reaction wheel #4 continues to exhibit signs of elevated friction levels and occasional torque spikes that appear to indicate a deterioration of the wheel bearing,” Hunter wrote in the April 29 update. 

The Kepler team’s top priority at the moment is gathering data while the observatory is still at full strength, Sobeck said, because it is unclear how much longer wheel No. 4 will last. “Right now, the data is still great,” Sobeck said. “Nothing’s more important than continuing to get high-quality data while we still can.” 

If and when wheel No. 4 fails, the mission team will likely try to recover it and wheel No. 2, he added. “Maybe we can just turn these wheels and power through whatever deterioration there is,” Sobeck said. “That may be sufficient; we don’t know.” 

But Kepler’s mission will likely change if such recovery actions do not work. The observatory probably will not be able to continue its “point-and-stare” search for exoplanets with only two working wheels, so it will have to switch to some type of scanning operations, Sobeck said.

The team has begun thinking about what a new scanning mode might be able to accomplish. Researchers also are trying to figure out ways to conserve fuel, so Kepler can keep operating for as long as possible if it needs to start using its thrusters to help point at targets. Kepler has been an incredibly successful mission by pretty much any measure, researchers say. The observatory has spotted more than 2,700 planet candidates to date. Just 122 of these worlds have been confirmed by follow-up observations so far, but mission scientists estimate that more than 90 percent will end up being the real deal.

The telescope has already outlasted its prime mission life of 3.5 years; it is currently working on an extended mission that takes it through at least fiscal year 2016.

Reducing the observatory to two working reaction wheels will not stop the flood of Kepler discoveries — such as the potentially life-supporting worlds Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f, which were announced earlier this month — at least not for a while.

“We’ve really only sort of looked at half the data set so far. We just haven’t had the time and the processing hours to go through it all,” Sobeck said. “If the Kepler spacecraft were to stop working today, the scientific output of the mission would continue for at least another year or two before you would see a dropoff.”