Scientists Debate Merits of Lunar Observatories

by












  Space News Business

Scientists Debate Merits of Lunar Observatories

By JEANNA BRYNER
Space News Staff Writer
posted: 12 December 2006
02:57 pm ET


BALTIMORE — Astronomers are split over the merits of putting observatories on the Moon rather than in space like the Hubble Space Telescope, which has been a boon to astronomy during its more than 16-year life in low Earth orbit.

Interest in lunar telescopes is growing now that NASA is planning to send astronauts back to the Moon by 2020 and establish outposts there by 2024.

“There’s a great temptation to jump on the bandwagon completely as some people say the train’s leaving the station and we’ve got to be on it. We are saying that might be a little na�ve,” said Dan Lester of the University of Texas at Austin.

In the first of what is likely to be several discussions, a diverse group of astronomers met here last week to begin formulating a science guide of sorts for lunar-based astronomy.

“The philosophy that I came to this meeting with was I want to identify what are very important problems in astrophysics and then to examine whether or not the return to the Moon can somehow lead to progress in answering these questions,” Mario Livio, a senior astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute , said in an interview.

Placing large telescopes on the lunar surface could be fruitful since the Moon lacks clouds and any blurring atmosphere. While space offers these attributes, the Moon also provides a permanent platform — a solid anchor — and its far side is free of radio noise.

Radio waves emitted by celestial objects are extremely weak. By the time they reach Earth-based radio telescopes the signals can easily be masked or contaminated by man-made interference from such things as cellular phones, wireless computer networks, garage door openers and digital television.

But radio astronomers point out that the planned architecture for getting to the Moon and staking out livable quarters has shortcomings.

“When they start talking about all the infrastructure [on the Moon], well it turns out there are no plans to put bases on the far side of the Moon,” Lester said. “This idea that we’re going to deploy this big telescope on the far side of the Moon, and magically we’re looking for this plug to plug into the wall somewhere, that this power and communication is going to be there is not as justifiable.”

Still, the idea of a radio observatory on the lunar surface has support.

“I think the low-frequency radio stuff looks pretty compelling,” said John Grunsfeld, a veteran astronaut and chief scientist at NASA headquarters in Washington . “It’s simple. It doesn’t require changing the architectures people are talking about.”

Jacqueline Hewitt of the Kavli Institute of Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge is developing a Moon-friendly material that involves printing metal onto sheets of plastic. The metal would act as dipoles for collecting radio waves. Once rolled up, the collectors could easily fit onto a rocket heading for the Moon and then easily be unrolled onto the lunar surface, Hewitt said.

“Just because it’s possible doesn’t make it optimal,” Lester said.

Lunar laboratory scientists led by Roger Angel, director of the Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics at the University of Arizona, envision a deep-field infrared observatory at the lunar south pole using a giant liquid-mirror telescope.

A once-shapeless pile of ionic liquid gets spun until it forms a perfect parabola for optics. On Earth these telescopes are limited to about six meters in diameter because the spinning whips up a wind that blurs the optics, while our planet’s atmosphere can lead to distortion and absorption of light before it arrives at the telescope.

On the Moon, there is no atmosphere and no wind.

Long wavelengths, coming from the light of distant galaxies formed long ago, have stretched as the universe has expanded. Since this low-energy, long wavelength energy is no t visible, infrared detection is optimal. Angel said his team could start with a mirror as small as 2 meters and work up to 20 meters and then possibly create a 100-meter scope on the Moon.

The telescope would have to remain upright, but if placed at one of the lunar poles could look at the same patch of space over long periods of time. Combined with a large aperture, the telescope would allow astronomers to view the first stars and their assembly into galaxies — a view unmatched by any current observatory on Earth or in space.

“I think the long-term character of the observatories is very important,” Angel said. “Even if funding goes away and don’t have any plans for 20 years, it’s still there.”

Some scientists argue that the Moon is a harsh place to work and humans have little to no experience working in lunar conditions. What they do have, Lester explained, is much experience working in space, including building, operating and servicing giant observatories like the Hubble Space Telescope . Hubble changed the idea of space science. “We came to understand that we could do the things in free space that we thought we could only do on the lunar surface,” Lester said.

“Let’s do astronomy on the Moon that really needs to be there, because it’s harder to do astronomy on the Moon than it is to do stuff in free space. And let’s be honest with ourselves, about what kind of astronomy still belongs in free space,” Lester said .

Here are a few other ideas astronomers are brainstorming for Moon-based science:

  • Test alternative theories of gravity: By placing mirrors on the Moon and measuring how long it takes for a laser shot from Earth to return, astronomers could come to more precise measurements of the Moon-Earth distance. This would help scientists detect any deviations from normal gravity.
  • Panspermia: It holds that life on Earth was seeded from space. By deploying sterile containers on the Moon and adding some lunar dust, called regolith, scientists could perhaps observe if viruses and other life forms begin to grow, suggesting they really could have fallen from space.
  • Observe Earth: By placing a telescope on the Moon, astronomers could image our planet in even greater detail than the Apollo-era pictures of the “big blue marble.”
  • Lunar building materials: The lunar soil and possible water-ice could be used for building something like a flywheel for producing solar or other power.