THE WOODLANDS, Texas — Despite not making it to the moon, NASA and others flying payloads on Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander say they still got useful data from the mission.

Peregrine launched Jan. 8 on the first flight of United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur. The spacecraft, though, suffered a propellant leak hours after launch that ruled out any chance of attempting a lunar landing. The spacecraft instead reentered a week and a half after launch.

Although Peregrine did not reach the moon, many of the payloads on board were tested during the flight. “In transit, we were going to keep most of those payloads in a survival mode,” said Dan Hendrickson, vice president of Astrobotic, during a March 11 session about the mission at the Lunar and Planetary Sciences Conference here. “But as our mission deviated, the plan deviated as well, much to the benefit of all the payloads.”

While many of the science payloads on Peregrine weren’t able to collect their intended data from the surface of the moon, they were able to be tested in space and, in some cases, perform some science.

Among them was the Linear Energy Transfer Spectrometer (LETS) instrument, which collected data about the cislunar radiation environment rather than on the lunar surface as intended. “We had to move our operations around to pull data down during the flight,” said Stuart George of NASA’s Johnson Space Center, one of the leaders of the instrument. “The instrument worked perfectly the whole time.”

Another NASA instrument, the Peregrine Ion-Trap Mass Spectrometer (PITMS), also was able to operate during the flight. It detected traces of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide that likely was from the lander’s oxidizer that suffered the leak. “That transient atmosphere, if you will, of the oxidizer around the spacecraft, that self-induced environment, persisted,” said Barbara Cohen, principal investigator for PITMS at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

One of the non-NASA payloads on Peregrine was Iris, a lunar rover built by students at Carnegie Mellon University. “We became a ‘RoverSat’ instead,” said Raewyn Duvall, program manager for Iris. That included testing out many of the rover’s subsystems and even turning some of its wheels to confirm they worked. “Everything that we were allowed to test worked.”

Astrobotic is currently reviewing the Peregrine mission to determine the root cause of the propellant leak and any changes that might be needed for the company’s larger Griffin lander, which is under development to launch NASA’s Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) mission. Hendrickson said after the presentation that the investigation was going well but did not offer a schedule for completing it.

NASA is following that investigation, said Joel Kearns, deputy associate administrator for exploration in NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, during a NASA town hall at the conference March 11. “Once we have the results of that, NASA will determine what actions we’re going to take in the future,” he said, including any specific changes for VIPER. “We will look at their failure review board findings and determine what steps we need to take for VIPER.”

Griffin and VIPER were set to launch as soon as this November, but Kearns, speaking at a Planetary Science Advisory Committee meeting March 5, said that will likely slip. “It is extremely unlikely they will fly before the end of this year,” he said, because of not just the Peregrine investigation but also other work to prepare the rover and lander for launch. He said NASA would wait to set a new date until after the Peregrine investigation is complete.

Jeff Foust writes about space policy, commercial space, and related topics for SpaceNews. He earned a Ph.D. in planetary sciences from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a bachelor’s degree with honors in geophysics and planetary science...