NASA Views Ares 1-X Test Rocket Debut as a Success Despite Parachute Mishap
NEW YORK — NASA is still perplexed over the parachute failure that damaged its new Ares 1-X test rocket during its October test launch, but otherwise the debut flight went well, mission managers said.
The $445 million suborbital Ares 1-X rocket, NASA’s first prototype of the vehicle it is developing to carry humans to orbit after the space shuttles retire, blasted off Oct. 28 from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. It soared eastward into the sky, peaked at about 45 kilometers altitude, then the solid-rocket first stage separated from its dummy second stage and dropped into the ocean as planned.
But two of three parachutes failed to deploy to soften the spent first stage’s splashdown. Consequently, the booster hit the water harder than expected, causing a huge dent and other damage. Since the parts are not intended to be reused, mission managers said the malfunction was not a major problem and they were able to gather all the data they needed.
“We’re still investigating what happened there and why,” said Marshall Smith, chief of the System Engineering and Integration Office for the Ares 1-X mission, during a Dec. 3 news conference.
Mission managers suspect that the chutes deployed earlier than planned, and thus took on more force than they were designed for, resulting in their failure.
The towering 100-meter Ares 1-X rocket was loaded with more than 700 onboard sensors to gather data about the booster’s trajectory and performance.
Among the promising signs revealed in the report was the fact that the rocket shook and rolled much less than some models predicted, which originally had been a concern for the Ares 1 design concept. Additionally, early visuals raised some fears that the first and second stages might have hit each other, or “re-contacted,” after separation, but detailed analysis revealed that they did not.
“First-stage separation was entirely nominal,” Smith said. “We’re pretty confident there’s no recontact issues.”
Additionally, three connectors failed to detach during the separation of the first and second stages. This was somewhat expected though, and the two pieces separated anyway, ripping the connectors.
“It didn’t really matter,” said Bob Ess, Ares 1-X mission manager. “We did assess this possible failure scenario before launch.”
Another odd finding was the measurement of the structural damping, which is basically how much the structure of the rocket is able to resist vibrations, during the test launch. The booster experienced about 20 percent less damping than models had predicted.
“I can’t tell you whether it’s bad or good — it just doesn’t match,” Smith said.
The engineers plan to investigate that issue and others as they continue to review the data, which are still in preliminary stages of analysis. Almost all the data were recovered from the rocket when teams retrieved the stage from the ocean, though the data at the end of the flight were not recorded properly to the disk. But mission managers said they had other versions of that data and were more concerned with the ascent than descent anyway.
“We’ve got loads of that data, so were not super concerned with getting that,” Smith said.
NASA is beginning to plan the next Ares 1 test flight, which is targeted for 2012.