A global mass killer could be tamed with the aid of satellite technology. Scientists are using data from Meteosat to help model and predict outbreaks
of malaria. “Satellite sensor data hold out hope for the development of
early-warning systems for diseases such as malaria, which kills between 1
and 2 million people each year,” says David Rogers, of Oxford University’s
Department of Zoology.
Rogers is part of a team based in Oxford, Nairobi and at NASA’s Goddard
Space Flight Center, Maryland, who are using Meteosat and other satellite
climate data to create mathematical models of the prevalence and spread of
malaria, and the dynamics of outbreaks of the disease.
“Malaria takes its
greatest toll in sub Saharan Africa,” explains Rogers, “but the failure of
affordable drugs, population growth and poverty are all contributing to a
steady increase in the scale of the problem.” It is against this background
that interest in using satellite surveillance to map and predict malaria
outbreaks is growing.
Malaria is a parasitic disease, spread by mosquitoes from infected to
healthy people. With today’s satellite technology, scientists now have the
ability to map climate conditions with the kind
of detail and timeliness required to model the behaviour of the parasite’s
mosquito vectors.
“Mosquito populations can grow and collapse in a few
days,” explains Rogers, “and some species live in very small pools of water
– even in up-turned coconut shells – so we really need all the temporal
and spatial resolution we can get. One of my colleagues once suggested we
needed a ‘Puddle-sat’ to
identify mosquito breeding areas.”
Several climate factors affect the mosquito population. David Rogers
explains: “Temperature, humidity and rainfall are all important to
mosquitoes at different stages of their life cycle but the relative
importance of each varies in different places. In cold places, temperature
limits the population and water generally doesn’t. In warmer places
temperature is usually not limiting but water may be. In
the hottest of places, all three factors tend to be limiting.”
The team has been searching for the best correlation between climate factors
and the incidence of malaria. The situation is complicated by the fact that
the relationship between the number of mosquitoes and the number of cases of
malaria is not a simple one; the inherent resistance or immunity of the
local people to the disease varies in cycles and the reporting and
recording of actual cases of infection on the ground is patchy at best.
To
help deal with this problem, the team have found that a measure of plant
growth is in fact very well matched to reported cases of malaria in many
locations in East Africa, so perhaps that index can be used to ‘fill in the
gaps’ in the patchy medical data.
The team believe they have now begun to see some clear patterns emerging in
the correlation of Meteosat cloud and rainfall data and malaria outbreaks,
as a paper in the journal Nature, published last week explains. But, adds
David Rogers “no prediction is ever 100% correct, so we see our work as
progressively approximating the real situation on the ground in a continuing
loop – make a
prediction, check it on the ground, find and investigate wrong predictions
and make a better model.”
With climate change threatening to change the prevalence of diseases like
malaria, it is more important than ever to develop good techniques for
predicting their behaviour. “It is clear that the technologies we now have
to study these diseases are far better than those available to
malariologists in the early years of the last century. The challenge is to
make the science of malaria prediction at least as good,” concludes David
Rogers. “All epidemiologists are looking
forward to
the greater information content of Meteosat SecondGeneration (MSG) data”.
The first MSG, developed by ESA in cooperation with EUMETSAT, will be launched by EUMETSAT this summer.
