Washington, Houston has a problem
If you are concerned that NASA budget cuts are crippling the International Space Station
Attend the
NASA Budget Town Hall Meeting
Friday – June 29 at 5:00 p.m.
Nassau Bay City Hall – 1800 NASA Rd.
Sponsored by
Congressman Nick Lampson
Featuring Houston Mayor Lee Brown
Other Congressional and local officials
Call LaBeth Ponish at 281-488-1187 for more information.
Democratic members of the Harris county U.S. congressional delegation
will meet with Mayor Lee Brown and citizens at a NASA Budget Town Hall
Meeting Friday afternoon to discuss the major problems expected as the space
agency reacts to drastic cuts in President Bush’s proposed space budget.
Held on the lawn of the Nassau Bay City Hall across from the Johnson Space
Center, the meeting offers an opportunity to learn about the budget’s
impact to the International Space Station and large predicted job losses in the
next few years.
Unlike most of the federal government, NASA’s budget, as proposed
by Bush, falls behind the pace of inflation and results in about a $300
million cut and sets in motion a series of program cuts that will cripple the
station currently under construction in space. The program cuts will
starve contracts of billions of dollars by canceling the station’s
propulsion module, habitation module, added solar arrays, and crew return
vehicle. Republican leadership in Congress is expected to support the proposed
cuts that will layoff thousands in Clear Lake.
These cuts, mandated by the Bush Office of Management and Budget,
will result in a “half-built” station that is defined as complete
before it has the capability of sustained, world-class science. Without the crew
return vehicle, crews will not grow beyond 3 members; allowing only the
equivalent of half a person to perform science after required maintenance
tasks. A large crowd of space workers is expected to speak out about their
interests and concerns about layoffs already begun.
U.S. Representatives Nick Lampson, Ken Bentsen, Sheila Jackson Lee,
and Gene Green are expected to attend the event, while Tom DeLay, John
Culberson, and Dick Armey, although invited, are not expected to attend. Clear
Lake Republican State Representative John Davis is expected to attend.
The attending legislators and Mayor Brown are working with local
business, labor, education, senior citizen, and non-profit groups to protest
the cuts and seek increases to protect Houston’s leadership role in human
space flight.
“The bottom line will always be, can we convince the
congressional leadership, especially in the House, of the importance of a strong
space station program?” said Congressman Lampson
Bay Area New Democrats (BAND) say the NASA cuts represent the early
impact of the Bush tax cuts on available federal money for important U.S. government programs. “I’m afraid current budgets mark the
beginning of the end for Houston’s leadership in space,” said Darryl Smith of
BAND. “Many space workers are disappointed that the NASA budget is being cut so
soon after they voted George W. Bush into office. Unfortunately, laid
off space workers won’t be able to enjoy any tax cuts.”
Washington: NASA and Houston have a problem: the NASA Budget!
NASA-JSC programs face the ax
cut below the level of inflation. This is equivalent to an
across-the-board cut of about $300 million, and the proposed budget leaves the space
station billions short of program requirements. While Clinton and Bush Sr.
cut NASA’s budgetary fat, our new president is targeting NASA’s
muscle.
return vehicle, propulsion module, habitation module, and additional solar
arrays. Long before completion, the station will be identified as
"complete." Stopping at a half-built station will shrink the station’s technical
value and cost thousands of local jobs.
15% as early as the fiscal year beginning in October 2002, followed quickly
by much higher layoff rates in 2003 and 2004. Thousands will be laid off
each year.
Budget starves science
crew of three instead of the planned seven. After a required 2.5
person-per-day maintenance on-orbit, there’ll be only "half a person" for
science! After maintenance operations, there’s barely crew time for any science at
all.
it is being squeezed out of ISS by cuts including cancellation of the solar
arrays that power experiments. NASA will be blamed for a "bait and
switch" when promises of world class science are replaced by assembly and
repair projects.
research hardware and operations. Only 10 of 37 research racks will be
built.
Proposed Bush budget cripples the station
is clearly pound-foolish
program in order to pay for current activities. DeLaying development of space
station modules will ultimately make them cost much more. This budget
reduces the number of shuttle flights per year and makes each flight cost
more.
station, throw away ISS hardware in design and development, and risk lives due
to poorly-planned cuts.
our country can afford it.
Bush’s approach to station drastically cuts capability and drains
funds from other parts of NASA
has directed a decrease in shuttle flights by about one flight per
year.
here, thus striping away local science and exploration work. JSC will defer
Mars exploration studies.
and cut.
If President Bush’s proposed budget cuts are enacted, the effects
at JSC may include:
placing facilities on stand-by
stand-by; leading to a probable decline in bio-research at the Medical
Center.
laboratory facilities
astronauts
complex. Facilities will be closed.
Band-aid approach creates a risky over-reliance on Russia and the international partners
weak economy. The U.S. shouldn’t have to rely on partners to complete
the station it leads. NASA undertook the international goals that
were estimated to save $2.5 billion; instead the cooperation cost
unexpected billions.
other internationals. Does it make sense to increase our reliance when it
has already cost U.S. taxpayers 100’s of millions of dollars? For the
long run, we shouldn’t commit key station functions such as propulsion to
Russian capabilities.
And don’t let anyone tell you space station is a failure; it’s a
huge success!
in space! Right now, we have the second expedition living in space,
working to develop the station and begin scientific research. Despite many
technical, operations and management challenges, the initial station orbits the
Earth after a series of successful assembly missions.
Are NASA and JSC being punished for the success of the space
station program?
responsibility moved to DC, and programs slashed. It’s like Tom DeLay’s vendetta
against Houston’s light rail. Bush’s Office of Management and Budget and
House appropriators attack and criticize JSC despite its excellent job of
building the highly complex station.
affairs benefits for our country which far outweigh monetary costs. Keeping
Russian space expertise away from rogue nations and focused on civilian space
has been successful, but Russian delays forced the program to spend
millions on delayed space station operations and caused our costs to rise
dramatically.
defines Houston’s key role in space, it is not clear why Tom DeLay and the
President want to punish JSC. Bush never visited the center as governor and
DeLay rarely visits the area even though his district includes much of
Clear Lake. Bush and Tom DeLay certainly have the power to support JSC and
station; we just need to ensure they know how much we care.
Station is estimated to cost more, but for good reasons.
project being the largest and most complex space initiative ever. NASA/JSC
program management estimated station costs reasonably considering the
challenges of the program and international issues. Russian involvement was more
costly than expected. Full-time space operations (24/7) have been
expensive, but NASA now knows how to reduce costs based on experience.
management, which quickly took steps to determine the reality of cost
increases. While some have said the increased costs could be between 2-4 billion, this
is a "worst-case" assessment and doesn’t account for program
improvements.
a fully functional, safe space station. The U.S. economy is strong
enough to support a world-class space station.
Bush’s budget priorities may cripple civilian space
Star Wars. The administration increases by billions the budget for the
unproven Star Wars "viewgraph" programs, but slashes budgets for a
station program with people living in space. Star Wars has spent $95 B in ten years
to only produce paper, while NASA spent about a quarter of that to put
humans permanently in space on the world’s most advanced space vehicle!
tough budget environment where all federal programs will have to fight to
the bitter end for every dollar of rapidly declining federal funds caused
by the recent tax cut. The worst is yet to come! A very small tax cut
will mean little to middle class families with unemployed breadwinners.
Budget cuts ultimately impact everyone in the Clear Lake area –
Perhaps the beginning of the end of Houston’s space leadership!
proposed cuts occur. It is time to restore NASA’s 2002 and out years
budget to levels that keep both our community and the Space Station Program financially sound. The president’s budget stifles future
technological advancements necessary to keep the U.S. a world leader in science
and technology, and will suffocate the JSC economic engine.
and 12,000 contractor personnel. In addition, because of the federal
dollars spent in the Clear Lake area, an additional 30,000 jobs are created
for our local economy each year. The current budget shows thousands laid off
in just a few years.
affect a hundred people here and a couple hundred there. Of course, the
impact of losing your job is devastating to you and your family. And these
cuts may mark the start of the reduction in JSC’s role in human space
flight. Jobs will be cut from sub-contracts, prime contracts, and the
government.
can occur, that is, if our nation can afford them.
demand for and value of local real estate. Ultimately even our great
public education system will suffer due to decreases in real estate
values.
But we can save station!
kind of "wake-up call" should convince people to take action.
Civil service employees and contractors can do as much as other citizens, and in
fact, they should do more since their very livelihoods depend on
government programs.
