NEW YORK — A team of researchers is looking to the M oon to develop the tools future astronauts may need to ward off potentially life-threatening levels of space radiation.
Currently mid way through their NASA-funded study, the researchers are working to determine whether a set of electrically charged shield spheres atop 40-meter masts could deflect radiation from a populated M oon base.
If it proves possible, such a radiation-proof screen — called an electrostatic shield — could protect astronauts from the long-lasting, and possibly fatal, radiation hazards of spaceflight beyond the Earth’s magnetic field.
“The electrostatic radiation shield is a pretty simple idea,” said the study’s co-principal investigator John Lane, an applications scientist with ASRC Aerospace Corp. at Kennedy Space Center (KSC). “We’re concerned about charged particle radiation.”
That radiation, high-energy protons and electrons spewed out by the Sun during massive solar storms or traversing the universe as galactic cosmic rays , is the main hazard targeted by Lane and his colleagues. ASRC researcher Charles Buhler is leading the study, which is a Phase 1 project funded by the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC).
While there were virtually no serious radiation-related problems during the short-term lunar exploration missions of the past such as the landings that occurred during the Apollo program, adequate shielding will be a necessity for long-term occupation of the M oon or other long-term space exploration projects, researchers said.
“A lot of people think about the Apollo astronauts, and that they didn’t have much protection and were fine,” Lane said. “But in Apollo, it was a very short mission and a lot of it was basically luck. I’m not sure how they managed to be so lucky, but I don’t think you can count on luck on short missions for the future or trips to the planets.”
Researchers have said that a major radiation event during any of the six Apollo M oon landings could have been catastrophic to the astronauts who carried them out. But Apollo crews lived on the M oon for days at most, while a long-term mission will run much longer.
Radiation from galactic cosmic rays or solar particles, however, would be extremely likely to affect a long-duration stay on the M oon, researchers said.
Currently, Lane and his colleagues are trying to find the best way to arrange large field generators of different sizes to create an electric field that repels high-energy protons and electrons.
“The first question is, ‘what field do you really need to stop these charged particles? ‘” Lane said.
Current designs call for weak, negatively charged spheres distributed along the shield’s outer regions to sift out electrons while strong, positively charged generators cluster at the center to deflect high-energy protons, Lane added.
But the challenge lies in arranging a number of spheres to build a comprehensive electric field that is strong enough to deflect radiation, but not so strong that it rips electrons out of the M oon base structure or surrounding material — hence the 40-meter poles to keep generators at a safe, water tank-high distance.
“That’s one of the design constraints,” Lane said.
The researchers are currently not addressing the shield design’s power needs, though scientists with past studies say they may be staggering.
“The real issue is what type of power levels will this type of shield need,” said NASA physicist Robert Youngquist, who is studying the potential of an electrostatic shield for future spacecraft. “If it’s too much current, that’s a potential show stopper.”
But at least for a lunar base, astronauts would have the benefit o f having half of their surface — mainly the floor — already shielded against radiation by the sheer bulk of the M oon, Youngquist said.
To maximize the effectiveness of a lunar electrostatic field, ASRC researchers envision a tiered approach to radiation protection.
Spherical generators could be combined with flat electrostatic screens placed low to the ground to keep M oon dust from being attracted to generator surfaces and clogging the works, Lane said, adding that the same lunar material could be tapped as a secondary shield.
“I think the most likely system will involve regolith or sand bags built up like an igloo,” he said. Regolith is the word planetary researchers use to describe the surface material on the M oon.
Meanwhile, Youngquist said there are still other researchers looking into developing radiation shields using magnetic fields and plasma, streams of electrons that have been ripped from their source atoms.
“Whether or not [the final shield used] is electrostatic, it’s still something we need to study closely,” Lane said, adding that there are still many other engineering challenges involved with future M oon and Mars exploration.” If it’s not a good method, at least we’ll know why.”