U.S. companies
to open up space to
ordinary citizens
saw total collective revenue
surpass a quarter of a billion dollars
in 2007, a 50 percent increase over the previous year, according to a new report commissioned by the Personal Spaceflight Federation.


Carissa Christensen, co-founder and managing partner of the Tauri Group, a market research firm that prepared the report, said the findings were based on interviews with 19 Personal Spaceflight Federation member companies and data gleaned from external research. In an interview here, she said she believes the report is the first formal quantification of the economic activity associated with this emerging industry.


The Tauri Group and the Personal Spaceflight Federation intend to update the report annually.


The report, highlights of which were slated for release
May 31 here at the 27th annual International Space Development Conference, shows that personal spaceflight was a $268 million industry in 2007. Fully
three-quarters of that
– or about $206 million – came from “hardware sales, development and support services.” Included in this category is
the SpaceShipTwo suborbital vehicle being developed by Scaled Composites of Mojave, Calif., for Virgin Galactic. Another example is
Space Exploration Technologies’ Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon capsule, which
are funded in part by NASA’s $500 million Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) space station logistics program and have
crew-carrying potential.

Christensen said COTS work by Hawthorne, Calif.-based Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, was the primary driver of the 67 percent growth in hardware and development revenue the industry saw from 2006 to 2007. In fact, all of SpaceX’s revenue, including income from the U.S. Defense Department for launches of the company’s Falcon 1 small rocket, was included in the total since the technology has application to the company’s human spaceflight effort, said John Gedmark, executive director of the Personal Spaceflight Federation.

noted that Oklahoma City-based Rocketplane Kistler’s 2006 and 2007 COTS revenue was
not included in the study since the company was focused strictly on a cargo-delivery capability.
Likewise, Orbital Sciences Corp.’s COTS work will not be included in next year’s report since the Dulles, Va.,
company likewise is focusing on
cargo delivery

Personal spaceflight services
$38.8 million in 2007, about one-seventh of the
industry total
for the year, the study found. This
includes the $20 million-per-seat Russian Soyuz flights booked through
Space Adventures of Vienna, Va., and the five- and six-figure deposits New Mexico-based Virgin Galactic and others have taken for future suborbital flights.

Finally, about $24 million of the industry’s 2007 revenue
came from non-spaceflight activities that
member companies engaged in to make ends meet. That figure was unchanged from 2006.


Brett Alexander, president of the
Washington-based Personal Spaceflight Federation, said the report paints a picture of an industry
. “We are not in the service-providing phase by and large,” he said.
“But the industry has moved from concept to real development. This report shows that significant development and significant investment activities are taking place. It’s an emerging industry and we
are in
the emerging phase of

Christensen said the federation’s
member companies
secured $1.2 billion in total investment commitments through the end of 2007, with about one-fourth of that money already received and spent.


Individuals and angel investors are by far the biggest source of capital
, accounting for just over half of the money
raised to date. Various government sources, including federal research and development
funds and state and local tax credits, account for another $270 million provided or promised through 2007. Private equity
and venture capital firms are
the next biggest source, coughing up $250 million, while reinvestment of profits by federation member companies
accounted for $12 million


“There have been so many numbers floated around – $2 billion of investment, $1 billion of investment. The question was:
what is the real number and why are we confident in that number?
” Alexander said, explaining the motive for
commissioning the report. “We want to be accurate about what the industry is and what it isn’t and where it’s going and where it’s not going.”


Examining the employment figures included in the report, SpaceX’s dominance of this fledgling segment of the broader space industry is once again in evidence

Of the 1,227 people employed by the Personal Spaceflight Federation’s 19 member companies, 470 work for SpaceX.
Most of that work force, however, currently is engaged in designing, building and preparing to fly the rockets needed to execute a 12-flight manifest that so far includes not a single crewed launch.


SpaceX’s 46,000 square meters of facility space – most of it acquired
only recently
– is nearly twice that of all other member companies combined, according to the report. However, Bigelow Aerospace, the Las Vegas
company working toward
deployment of a small commercial space station, is building
an additional 18,500 square meters of office and factory space that is due to be finished
by 2010, the report says.

Comments: bberger@space.com