Ancient Ice Field Could Explain Salty Deposits on Mars

by












  Space News Business

Ancient Ice Field Could Explain Salty Deposits on Mars

By ANDREA THOMPSON
Space News Staff Writer
posted: 27 February 2009
07:23 am ET






NEW YORK
— Enigmatic MeridianiPlanum deposits on Mars – deep salty areas discovered by NASA’s
rover – have attracted several theories to explain their existence in recent years.

Add another one to the list: the martian deposits could be remnants of a massive ancient ice-field, a new study suggests.

This new icy theory better explains some of the odd signatures of the deposits, its authors say. The finding, detailed in the Feb. 15 online version of the journal Nature Geoscience, “advances a new idea for how the sedimentology of Mars developed,” said study co-author Paul Niles of NASA’s
Johnson
Space
Center
in
Houston
.

discovered the deposits, which are nearly
0.8 kilometers
deep in places, when it landed on Mars in 2004. Similar layers are seen scattered across the planet, but are concentrated around Meridiani, an area that covers several hundred square kilometers.

The deposits feature thick layers of salty minerals, including calcium and magnesium sulfates.

Previous theories on the origin of the deposits include evaporation of a giant ocean that once covered the northern plains of Mars and the evaporation of shallow pools created by groundwater bubbling up from below the surface.

On Earth, similar salty deposits, such as those in White Sands, N.M., are known to have come from the evaporation of lakes.

But lakes and oceans require an enclosed space to hold the water, which Meridiani does not have. The 2007 study used a model to show the area was suited to groundwater upwelling, but
Niles
says it still leaves some of the chemistry of the deposits unexplained.

On Earth, ocean evaporate deposits are purely calcium sulfates, because magnesium stays dissolved in the water. But on Mars, there are “mixtures of minerals that don’t really seem to go together,”
Niles
said in an interview. “It’s an interesting thing to try to explain.”

The theory put forward by
Niles
and his co-author Joseph Michalski, of the Universite Paris Sud in
France
, provides an explanation for the discrepancy.

The new theory draws on the mechanism that scientists think is responsible for forming the ice that currently tops Mars’ polar caps.

It is thought that the ice forms from snow created in the atmosphere when water is sucked up by dust and aerosols, a process called nucleation – the same process is also responsible for the snow and rain on Earth. Much of the aerosol incorporated into the snow was likely sulfur dioxide from volcanic emissions,
Niles
said.

“It’s kind of like acid rain on Earth,” he said.

All that ice and dust and aerosol eventually gets incorporated into a large ice field. While the ice reflects incoming sunlight, the dust grains absorb it and “get warmer than the ice,”
Niles
explained. The ice around the grains melts, creating little pockets where the trapped materials can react with the water.

The sulfur aerosols make the water acidic, and it stays very acidic because any excess water is frozen out by the extremely cold temperatures.

Because the acidic water is kept in small pockets, the minerals in the silicate dust grains don’t separate out like they would in a larger space. Such aggregates of grains have been seen in Antarctic ice cores.

Niles
and Michalski propose that the ice was able to form around the area of Meridiani, which is nowhere near the poles today, because the past climate of Mars was different. Either a natural wandering of the Martian poles or changes in its degree of tilt, which could put the equator in the position of the poles today, could have made the area colder in the past.

The climate later changed, and the ice sublimed, leaving behind the clumps of minerals. This dust could later have been blown from its original position, reworking it into the apparently windblown deposits observed today.

The case of how the deposits came to be still is not closed though, and it may take a rover exploring these or similar deposits to nail their origin down.

“There’s a lot more work to be done to figure out how this happened,”
Niles
said.