NASA’s total budget would increase by 1.8 percent, to $14,511.4
million, under President Bush’s FY 2002 request. “We face some
difficult decisions,” NASA Administrator Dan Goldin remarked.
“The President fully expects NASA to live within the requested
funding levels, and is aware that doing so will require some
difficult decisions. We are proposing to Congress in this budget
plan that some lower priority activities be eliminated to allow
for a much more vigorous space and science exploration program.”

Compared to the FY 2001 budget, Space Science funding would rise
by 5.7 percent, but Earth Science funding would experience a 13.9
percent decrease. Biological and Physical Research would
decrease by 6.9 percent. Human Space Flight would increase by
2.5 percent but, within this account, funding for the
International Space Station would drop by 1.2 percent. At the
budget press briefing, Goldin announced that “The fiscal 2002
budget includes strong support for the Space Launch Initiative
[$4.5 billion over the next five years] and for improving
Aviation safety, Space Science programs, Earth Sciences and for
Shuttle Safety improvements.”

With this request, the agency is proposing to reorganize many of
its accounts, incorporating activities that used to fall under
mission support and supporting technology development, and
eliminating the Mission Support account. This year NASA
presented two different versions of its FY 2002 request; one
reflecting the reorganization of accounts, and another that shows
funding for programs as organized in the current fiscal year, to
enable comparisons between FY 2002 and FY 2001 funding. The
percentages cited above are a direct comparison of program
funding levels between the two years and do not reflect the
reorganization of accounts. Both forms of the request will be
shown below. This FYI will cover the request for Space Science
and Academic Programs; the next will address Earth Science,
Biological and Physical Research, and Human Space Flight.

SPACE SCIENCE REQUEST: Up 5.7 percent in direct comparison

The proposed budgets for FY 2002 and beyond, Goldin said, “enable
the opportunity for the Space Science communities to do exciting,
wonderful new work. There’s a caution, however. This
Administration has made it clear that growth in mission funding
requirements will need to be offset within this budget plan.
Hard decisions had…and will have…to be made.” He continued,
“We’ve had to offset development problems with [SIRTF] and
Gravity Probe-B with other reductions within Space Science. We
wanted the funds to mount a more aggressive Mars exploration
program. We got the funds, but the offset came from canceling
Pluto-Kuiper Express and Solar Probe. This is one example of the
type of priority reexamination that is going on at NASA, as
encouraged by the President. And, personally, I think that it’s
the way it ought to be.”

NASA has recently restructured its Mars Exploration Program;
plans include launch in 2003 of twin Mars Exploration Rovers and
launch of a Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2005. NASA will
continue to evaluate proposals for alternatives to the Pluto
mission. The Solar Probe mission was not considered a near-term
budget priority and will not receive funding in FY 2002. NASA
currently has 29 operating Space Science spacecraft, and plans to
launch about nine more before the end of FY 2002. 

SPACE SCIENCE         FY 2001     FY 2002 Req.         FY 2002 Req.
REQUEST               Budget      (direct comparison)  (Reorganized)
   (In millions)
Space Science Total   $2321.0      2453.0              2786.4
Relativity/GP-B          41.2        40.2                40.2
HST Development         179.5       161.8               161.8
SOFIA                    38.9        37.0                37.0
SIRTF                   118.4       105.9               105.9
TIMED                    13.3        ---                  ---
STEREO                   ---         50.3                50.3
GLAST                    ---         19.4                19.4
Payloads                 33.4        44.8                44.8
Explorer Program        141.3       155.0               155.0
Mars Surveyor Prog.     427.6       430.9               430.9
Discovery               213.0       217.1               217.1
Operating Missions       85.3       105.3               105.3
Technology programs     419.1       478.8               478.8
Research programs       596.8       606.5               606.5
Additional funding for
    Academic programs    13.2        *                   *
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
R&PM                      ---      ---                  311.9
Constr. of facilities.    ---      ---                   21.5

*Funding transferred to Academic Programs

ACADEMIC PROGRAMS: Up 15.8 percent in direct comparison

Goldin expressed concern “that there will not be enough young
scientists and engineers to carry-on in the pursuit of research
and development.” He said NASA is “proposing the establishment
of a significant number of scholarships in science and
engineering. We will link those to our current summer student
and faculty programs, so the students can work at our field
centers, side-by-side with our scientists and engineers.” 

ACADEMIC PROGS.         FY 2001     FY 2002 Req.        FY 2002 Req.
REQUEST                 Budget      (direct comparison) (Reorganized)
     (In millions)
Academic Progs. Total   $132.7      153.7               153.7
Education Programs        76.8       71.6                71.6
Minority University
    Res. & Educ.          55.9       82.1                82.1
(Additional funding
    not shown above)     (36.2)      ---                 ---

###############

Audrey T. Leath

Public Information Division

The American Institute of Physics

fyi@aip.org

(301) 209-3094

http://www.aip.org/gov

##END##########