Congress, NASA Compromise on Commercial Crew Acquisition Plan
WASHINGTON — A key congressional critic of NASA’s commercial crew acquisition strategy has backed away from his insistence that the agency truncate the ongoing competition and proceed immediately with the selection of a single contractor.
Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) announced June 5 that he had reached a deal with NASA Administrator Charlesthat clears the agency to sign funded Space Act Agreements this summer with multiple companies developing privately operated crew transportation systems for the international space station (ISS).
But Wolf also insisted that he had wrung some concessions from NASA, including a pledge to vet the financial health of commercial crew contenders before making new awards and a commitment to provide more details soon on how it intends to handle spacecraft certification and flight services contracts down the road.
“Wolf raised a bunch of issues and NASA had to deal with him,” said Jim Muncy, an Alexandria, Va.-based consultant and longtime commercial space advocate. “I think Wolf deserves credit for forcing NASA to come to the table and straighten their act out.”
As chairman of the House appropriations subcommittee that funds NASA, Wolf authored a spending measure calling for the agency to immediately narrow the field of commercial crew competitors, either by picking a single provider now or adopting a so-called leader-follower strategy where the bulk of the money goes to the most promising company. The spending measure — the 2013 Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill (H.R. 5326) approved May 10 in the House — also rejected NASA’s request for $830 million for the Commercial Crew Program, providing just $500 million for a condensed effort. Companion legislation now before the Senate would provide $525 million for commercial crew.
“I remain convinced that the approach outlined in the committee’s report is the most appropriate way forward for the program,” Wolf said in a June 5 statement. “However, in an effort to prevent any disruption in the development of crew vehicles to return U.S. astronauts to ISS as quickly as possible, I have reached an understanding with NASA Administrator Charles Bolden in an exchange of letters that will allow the upcoming Commercial Crew Integrated Capability (CCiCAP) phase to proceed under a revised, more limited management roadmap and with an [sic] fiscal year 2013 funding level at or near the Senate Appropriations Committee approved amount.”
In a letter to Bolden dated May 31 — the same day commercial crew contender Space Exploration Technologies Corp. () completed its historic cargo-delivery demonstration mission to the ISS — Wolf outlined several elements of this revised approach, including:
- NASA will award Space Act Agreements “to no more than 2.5 program partners (i.e., two full awards and one partial award), with the final number of awards made representing the minimum necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the [Commercial Crew Program’s] primary objective.”
- The upcoming CCiCap awards — which NASA has said will fund a 21-month-effort to take the competing concepts through critical design review — will be “the final phase of general development funding” for commercial crew contenders. Any follow-on money will be provided only for Federal Acquisition Regulation-type certification and service contracts.
Bolden, in a June 4 letter to Wolf, confirmed those and other points and made an appeal for more commercial crew money.
“I would emphasize that it is very important that the final FY2013 funding for the [Commercial Crew Program] be as robust as possible,” he said. He said a final appropriation closer to the president’s request is “highly desirable, in that it will increase NASA’s ability to deliver the safe and effective program we both wish to see accomplished.”
He added that even more funding will be required in later years to effectively carry out the commercial crew plan.
The breakthrough was praised by commercial crew supporters and skeptics alike.
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas — the top Republican on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee and the Senate Appropriations commerce, justice, science subcommittee — applauded NASA’s agreement to limit the number of companies that would continue to receive development funding for competing crew transport systems.
“I had previously called for NASA to down-select from four potential providers to the top two firms,” Hutchison said in a press release. “Today’s announcement follows that prescription and is welcome news.”
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), one of the more outspoken commercial crew advocates in the House, also issued a statement praising the compromise.
“I am pleased that [Commercial, Justice, Science] Appropriations Chairman Frank Wolf and NASA Administrator Bolden were able to come to an agreement ensuring that the Commercial Crew Program will move forward quickly while preserving competition in the program,” Rohrabacher said. “This leadership will help bring about safe, reliable, domestic access to space for our astronauts on commercial vehicles, saving money, creating jobs in America, and leveraging our greatest strengths to maintain our international leadership in space.”
Mike Gold, director of Washington Operations for Bigelow Aerospace — a North Las Vegas, Nev.-based company developing private inflatable space stations that are stuck on the ground for want of affordable launches — was pleased with the turn of events.
“Proceeding with no more than two or ‘two-and-a-half’ entities is the only way to achieve programmatic success in the near-term,” Gold said June 6. “This compromise was one small step for commercial space, and one giant leap for common sense.”